RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infection with viral pneumonia (PNA) is known to offset the coagulation cascade. Recent studies assessing novel SARS-CoV-2 infection observed a high frequency of systemic thrombotic events resulting in ambiguity if severity of infection or specific viral strain drive thrombosis and worsen clinical outcomes. Furthermore, limited data exists addressing SARS-CoV-2 in underrepresented patient populations. OBJECTIVES: Assess clinical outcomes events and death in patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia compared to patients with other types of viral pneumonia. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study evaluated electronic medical records in adult patients admitted to University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System (UIHHSS) with primary diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 PNA or other viral (H1N1 or H3N2) PNA between 10/01/2017 and 09/01/2020. Primary composite outcome was the following event incidence rates: death, ICU admission, infection, thrombotic complications, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and major bleeding. RESULTS: Of 257 patient records, 199 and 58 patients had SARS-CoV-2 PNA and other viral PNA, respectively. There was no difference in primary composite outcome. Thrombotic events (n = 6, 3%) occurred solely in SARS-CoV-2 PNA patients in the ICU. A significantly higher incidence of renal replacement therapy (8.5% vs 0%, p=0.016) and mortality (15.6% vs 3.4%, p=0.048) occurred in the SARS-CoV-2 PNA group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed age, presence of SARS-CoV-2, and ICU admission, aOR 1.07, 11.37, and 41.95 respectively, was significantly associated with mortality risk during hospitalization; race and ethnicity were not. CONCLUSION: Low overall incidence of thrombotic events occurred only in the SARS-CoV-2 PNA group. SARS-CoV-2 PNA may lead to higher incidence of clinical events than those observed in H3N2/H1N1 viral pneumonia, and that race/ethnicity does not drive mortality outcomes.
RESUMEN
Inpatient consultation-liaison (CL) psychiatry teams routinely facilitate the transfer of medically stable patients in behavioral health crisis from the general hospital to inpatient psychiatric units. The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on this process when inpatient psychiatric units were unable to provide care for patients with asymptomatic COVID-19 infection because of infection control concerns in units unable to accommodate isolation precautions. Similar to other disrupted hospital workflows, these clinical handoffs became more complicated by requiring COVID exposed or COVID+ patients in the midst of behavioral health crisis to quarantine or isolate on general hospital units if not otherwise stable for discharge to the community. To better respond to the growing number of patients isolating in the general hospital during the 2022 Omicron surge, we used quality improvement (QI) methodology to illustrate the need to create a COVID+ unit in the inpatient psychiatric hospital to care for the growing cohort of COVID+ patients in psychiatric crisis who were otherwise unable to access traditional psychiatric hospital care because of their isolation status.